tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post115242963914694108..comments2023-10-06T17:45:57.509+02:00Comments on The Cool Sun: Good morningSands | കരിങ്കല്ല്http://www.blogger.com/profile/12373515723652244893noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1153577382226847122006-07-22T16:09:00.000+02:002006-07-22T16:09:00.000+02:00I believe kuttan could've choosen a better topic. ...I believe kuttan could've choosen a better topic. But looking at the responses, here is what I have to say. I loved the last comment ""If they spent that money which they spent for 'shudhikalasam' for some charity purpose it's more appreciable.............."".. I totally agree with this.<BR/><BR/>If we can change focus to reservation topic then I guess here's what I have to say. In my opinion reservation is for someone who is not abe to make inroads due to their incapabilites of proper education, opportunities. So if the government feels that they are creating opportunities by reservation in the current way then they are TERRIBLY WRONG, buy reserving a few seats without opening more colleges is ridiculous. Thoug this topic will be debated over and over again without any decent conclusion, I believe that time can be the best answer. In my recent visits to USA i clearly saw the way the backward (blacks and mexicans) are being exploited. In a company where close to 50,000 worked, I met close to 3-4 blacks. A very pathetic situation, they are denied basic facilites and education, kept in the dark and for generations together can never prosper in the current situation. If you look at the Reservation issue from a different perspective, Imagine you are a backward class student with a meagre economic background. Then all you need is some money to get admitted, If you are interested in studies then you need somebody to pay fees. You may need somebody to pay up a small sum as surety for a government job. <BR/>Let's debate this topic more rigorously.... I'm waiting to conclude this topic with a plan waiting to be proposed.<BR/><BR/>Finally Hi and Bye to all<BR/>GurusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1153234788467431282006-07-18T16:59:00.000+02:002006-07-18T16:59:00.000+02:00Since yesudas and meera jasmine are celebreties, i...Since yesudas and meera jasmine are celebreties, it's possible to identify. If an ordinary non-hindu person go to temple how do they make out? If they spent that money which they spent for 'shudhikalasam' for some charity purpose it's more appreciable..............<BR/><BR/>All the rules are made my humans, not GOD. Even God concept is in our heart.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152609262704768862006-07-11T11:14:00.000+02:002006-07-11T11:14:00.000+02:00basically it boils down the issue that people are ...basically it boils down the issue that people are not acting/reacting in the right way. <BR/><BR/>True, it's a shame on the junta.<BR/><BR/>- Sands.Sands | കരിങ്കല്ല്https://www.blogger.com/profile/12373515723652244893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152599988475033222006-07-11T08:39:00.000+02:002006-07-11T08:39:00.000+02:00btw who are the custodians of Hindu temples ? its ...btw who are the custodians of Hindu temples ? its not the priests..its the people... so if ppl say that they can be allowed.there ends the matter... its a shame that these issues are getting bigger and bigger<BR/>karthikAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152538339157246162006-07-10T15:32:00.000+02:002006-07-10T15:32:00.000+02:00I think, I disagree. The traditions are old.. that...I think, I disagree. The traditions are old.. that doesn't mean they are correct. In that case, how is un-touchability wrong? It was an old yet wrong tradition. So, if we find something is better than the current tradition - simply change it. Again for the question WHO WILL CHANGE IT?<BR/><BR/>If you are a malayalee, you might have heard "Annaara-kkannanum/kunjum thannaalayathu" (A squirrel too does whatever it can - the story can be traced back to Ramayana, Building of the bridge). Similarly everyone should do what (s)he can.<BR/><BR/>And as long as nobody is ready to change, the world too wont change.<BR/><BR/>Btw, I am curious to know with whom I am having a "flame war" (i am no Torwalds, nor Tanenbaum).<BR/><BR/>- Sands<BR/>PS: If you know me, I think I have guessed you.Sands | കരിങ്കല്ല്https://www.blogger.com/profile/12373515723652244893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152529409900268892006-07-10T13:03:00.001+02:002006-07-10T13:03:00.001+02:00its ok to ask them whether they believe in the rel...its ok to ask them whether they believe in the religion and its principles then why should a non-hindu believer of hinduism should expect the priest community to change the age old traditions. why can't they change themselves. the idea is change. no one can change themselves. every one expects the change to be such that people can avail the facility without having them to change themselves. that is selfishness.<BR/><BR/>no one will understand what you say. because no one here will compromise and no one can accept change and change themselves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152529404343140852006-07-10T13:03:00.000+02:002006-07-10T13:03:00.000+02:00its ok to ask them whether they believe in the rel...its ok to ask them whether they believe in the religion and its principles then why should a non-hindu believer of hinduism should expect the priest community to change the age old traditions. why can't they change themselves. the idea is change. no one can change themselves. every one expects the change to be such that people can avail the facility without having them to change themselves. that is selfishness.<BR/><BR/>no one will understand what you say. because no one here will compromise and no one can accept change and change themselves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152525336347622162006-07-10T11:55:00.000+02:002006-07-10T11:55:00.000+02:00I think beliefs are in mind. I might be a Hindu, b...I think beliefs are in mind. I might be a Hindu, but by belief I am not. Still I have the rights to enter. Nobody is concerned. And someone who is really a believer can't enter seems stupid to me. Why do you ask them to convert. Just ask them - do you believe in Hindu Gods and Hinduism? If the answer is yes, I think they have qualified. <BR/><BR/>And regarding praying from anywhere, it's again belief. Someone thinks, temples have more 'concentration' of God. Some are looking for the peaceful atmosphere there. May be some want to do some rituals (pushpanjali.. etc). For that they need temple itself.<BR/><BR/>But, I do agree with what you told in the beginning... "it's difficult to change ppl". <BR/><BR/>I dont understand what they say. They dont understand what I say. It's better if I understand atleast this much.<BR/><BR/>- Sands.Sands | കരിങ്കല്ല്https://www.blogger.com/profile/12373515723652244893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26501333.post-1152521791593438822006-07-10T10:56:00.000+02:002006-07-10T10:56:00.000+02:00there is no point in making comments. its difficul...there is no point in making comments. its difficult to change people. the way you believe that god in non-existant, the same way priest-community believe that non-hindus should not be allowed to enter temples. why not ask non-hindu believers of hinduism to get converted and then enter temples.<BR/><BR/>By the way who is stopping people to follow and practice any religion. Just the rule of disallowing non-hindus to enter temples should not stop them. Is it that God will listen to prayers only when you go to temple. If one believes in god, one can also believe that, God is everywhere rather than only inside a temple.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com