Lately, I've been reading a couple of blogs/articles where people argue over topics like GOD/Atheism, Indo-US Nuclear-Deal etc.
But.. in a week moment, I got involved in one of the arguments from the first category. I should say that I was surprised to see that many of the participants [from both sides] didn't even know the ground rules of carrying on a healthy discussion. And as one would expect, the debate got over without reaching a conclusion. :(
I am a hard-core atheist by all means - very much convinced about the non-existence of a supreme-intelligent-designer-being. But I realized that I was not knowledgeable enough to convince someone who wasn't convinced yet. If I really want one thing in life, it is knowledge. I started to make myself knowledgeable.
I started to:
- Follow some of the links I got from the debates - links which even take you to the big-bang. [eg: First three minutes (book) by Steven Weinberg, Nobel Laureate]. Haven't finished the book - but till now, it'd been wonderful.
- Read a religious text. Well, I could only start with it. It was ultra-mega boring - which means that it would take ages before I finish reading it. But I do want to read it.
- Watch Mr. Dawkins - his debates in youtube and google-video, programs @ BBC. This person is an awesome character. Too smart to be true. Totally logical, sensible, terrific, awesome.
I, whom I myself consider quite smart and intelligent, take sometimes a moment before really understanding his arguments. He is that good. Do you know, how useful these arguments could be - for your brain-muscle exercises? :)
So, I have been reading up Physics, Religion and listening to creationist-vs-evolutionist arguments. That is one of the reasons along with fever, which kept me away from the blog for about two weeks.
This entry was probably not a light read. Will try for a light read next time.
And this entry is dedicated to this great person, Dawkins, who never loses his temper, against pompous fools.
Signing off, Sands.
PS: If you are interested, you can watch a set of nice dialogues between Mr. Dawkins and Mr. McGrath - HERE. A long one, which gets a little boring in between.
PS2: The picture -- I took from Max Plank Institute
PS3: The post is over here - the following is the scrap/byproduct, from the production of the post.! :)
Two friends of mine were arguing. One of them lost the argument. What does it mean?
Does it always mean, in an argument, when one of the participants lose, that the other person was right?
Not necessarily, right?
It could also mean that one of them was better at arguing.
Well, we are coming to the topic: Debates.
I haven't been coming to my English blog as frequently as I used to earlier. Well, there are mainly two reasons.
(i) I was getting a little more involved in Malayalam blogland.
(ii) I was down with fever.
The beauty of Malayalam blogland is that, first of all it is not so huge and large as this one; I personally know most of the main players there.
Secondly, there are quite a few debates*/arguments going on among the bloggers - almost at all times.
Thirdly, one can find all genres of comedy too in there - which of course should be one of the main reasons for getting new people.